This episode digs into the history and background of Zabbix's birth, its evolution from release 1.0 to 8.0 LTS which brings OpenTelemetry, and the real problem it solves: fragmented monitoring, unifying collection, storage, visualization, and alerting in a single platform.

Episode 0 already made sure your environment is ready. Now it's time to understand why Zabbix exists. Episode 1 answers three big questions: where Zabbix comes from, how it has evolved, and what problem it solves for you as a SysAdmin, DevOps engineer, or SRE.
Many people start using Zabbix because of a tutorial, when understanding its background is far more valuable. By knowing the problem it solves, you'll find it easier to decide when to use Zabbix, when not to, and how to position it within your observability architecture. Let's start at the beginning of the story.
Zabbix was created by Alexei Vladishev in 2001 in Latvia as an open source project. His vision from the start wasn't merely to make a metric graphing tool, but a complete and integrated monitoring platform — able to collect data, store it, visualize it, and send notifications, all in a single system.
The Zabbix name itself is said to come from a Russian wordplay combining zabbix and monitoring. More important than the name was the decision: staying open source from day one, GPL-licensed, with no paid version for core features. This decision is what made Zabbix last more than two decades.
Zabbix grew through major releases, each bringing breakthroughs:
| Period | Release | Key Point |
|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 1.0 | First stable release |
| 2012 | 2.0 | First modern frontend |
| 2016 | 3.0 | First LTS, host inventory |
| 2018 | 4.0 | Kiosk mode, UI improvements |
| 2020 | 5.0 | Kafka integration, better templating |
| 2022 | 6.0 LTS | HA cluster and kubelet monitoring |
| 2024 | 7.0 LTS | Cloud-native proxy, website transactions |
| 2025 | 7.4 | Standard release, usability refinements |
| 2026 | 8.0 LTS | OpenTelemetry, core modernization |
As of 2026, the releases relevant to you: 7.0.29 LTS (latest LTS, supported until 2029), 7.4.13 (latest standard, supported until September 2026), and 8.0 LTS which is in beta. We'll dissect 7.0 LTS and 8.0 in depth in episodes 20 and 21.
Thanks to its open source model and feature maturity, Zabbix has become one of the most widely used enterprise monitoring platforms. Zabbix is free to use with no license fees, with active support governed by the official release policy. This differs from many commercial monitoring products that charge per host.
zabbix_server --versionThe command zabbix_server --version shows the installed version. The habit of checking versions matters because Zabbix enforces a strict release policy — LTS for stability, standard releases for new features.
The classic problem Zabbix solves is fragmented monitoring: teams use separate tools for each need. One tool for network uptime, another for server metrics, another for logs, and another for alerting. The result is scattered data, no single source of truth, and slow incident investigation.
Zabbix unifies everything into one platform. Metric collection, storage of historical data, visualization, alerting, and event processing live in one system with one database. When an incident happens, you don't switch between tools — all the answers are in one place.
The second problem is scale. Zabbix is designed to monitor large infrastructures. With the help of proxies for offloading remote locations and HA clusters for availability, Zabbix can handle tens of thousands of hosts and millions of items in a single centralized deployment.
collect → store → visualize → alert → actThe flow above is Zabbix's pulse: each host sends data, the server stores it, the frontend displays it, triggers evaluate it, and actions send notifications. We'll dissect this flow in detail in episode 2.
The third problem is cost. Enterprise monitoring platforms like Datadog or Dynatrace charge per host, and those costs can balloon with scale. Zabbix offers similar capabilities — agent-based, templating, HA, RBAC, API — with no license fees. All you spend is the infrastructure cost of running it.
Let's summarize in a real working context. You need Zabbix if:
Conversely, if your needs are purely cloud-native with highly dynamic Kubernetes metrics, or full observability with deep tracing, consider Prometheus and the LGTM stack — we'll cover the full comparison in episode 22.
To understand Zabbix's role, look at how it sits in the monitoring technology stack:
network devices + servers + VMs + cloud + applications
└── Zabbix Agent / Agent2 / SNMP / HTTP
└── Zabbix Server + Proxy
└── Database (MySQL / PostgreSQL)
└── Frontend + API
└── Action: email, webhook, TelegramThe bottom layer is the data source — from switches, servers, to applications. Zabbix collects from them via agents and standard protocols, the server processes, the database stores, and the frontend displays and triggers notifications. Understanding this position helps you place Zabbix correctly when designing an observability architecture.
Info
Choosing a monitoring platform isn't a one-time decision. Many teams run Zabbix for classic infrastructure alongside Prometheus for Kubernetes workloads. Understanding this background helps you make the right decision at the right time.
Episode 1 gave you context: Zabbix was born in 2001 from the hands of Alexei Vladishev, evolved from 1.0 to 8.0 LTS which brings OpenTelemetry, and is now an enterprise-grade open source monitoring platform solving three big problems: fragmented monitoring, scale limitations, and expensive license costs.
Key takeaways:
In the next episode 2 we'll discuss core concepts and main architecture — the Zabbix Server, Agent, Proxy, Frontend, Database, and API components, the data flow from item to action, and the difference between active and passive collection modes. This is the architectural foundation that will accompany the entire series.